A new discovery sheds new light on the history of goosebumping and shows that it wasn’t the flu that wiped out the genre, according to new research.
The manuscript art for the manuscript for the book The Goosebumps: A Journey to the Heart of the World was originally printed in the early 1800s, and its cover is inscribed with a goosebump.
The illustration of a female looking at a duck in the background is a variation of the same type of artwork found on an 18th-century manuscript.
The artwork on the cover is unique in that it shows a woman’s face while a bird stands in the foreground.
A bird on a wing, a goose and a book in hand.
The artwork is also a very common motif on the covers of some of the earliest editions of books, and it appears on the front cover of the first volume of the Goosebump: A Voynich Book of the Dead, a 1641 English edition that was first published by Charles Scribner and Sons.
In a new paper published in the journal PLoS ONE, researchers from the University of Pennsylvania, University of Southern California and the National Library of Singapore looked at the artwork of a manuscript called The Goosebump: A Complete Edition of the Complete Voynik [sic] Book of Birds.
They analyzed the artwork and found that the artwork was not a copy, but a new copy that has a different name and has a new illustration.
They say their research shows that there are many different copies of this artwork that are not the original.
This new discovery is also consistent with the view that the goosebumps are the artworks of a second author who created the illustrations.
They say the illustrations are highly distinctive and suggest that they were created in the 18th century, which is not true.
The authors note that the first edition of the book, which was published in 1815, has several illustrations that are strikingly similar to those on the Goosebumps cover, suggesting that the artist may have reused the same illustrations for two editions.
This discovery, they say, shows that the art was not created by the same artist who created The Goosepumps cover in 1817.
The artist who wrote the book may have chosen to reuse the same drawings for two books.
The research team is using a technique called optical character recognition to determine which illustrations are from the first printing and which are from another printing.
They used a software program to analyze the artwork, and the team found that, in addition to the goose bumps, the original illustrations are also strikingly similar.
“Our study provides strong evidence that the illustrations on the first Goosebumper edition were not original,” said co-author and University of Penn professor of classics Anne C. Smith.
“We have a good indication that the original illustrator of the illustrations in the Goosepickers book was a different artist from the illustrator on the second Goosebumpe.”
In addition to its title, the book contains a list of the names of several famous authors and the year in which they were born.
Its illustrations also show drawings of birds and the moon, with the word moon in bold on one bird and the word birds on the other.